Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman Logo - Link to home page Spacer for design
Sitemap | Search     
Home Can the Ombudsman help you? Publications About us News Work for us Contact us Spacer line
spacer gif  Navigation triangle Publications
spacer gif  Navigation triangle Principles
spacer gif  Navigation triangle Selected cases
spacer gif  Navigation triangle Special reports
spacer gif  Navigation triangle Annual Report
spacer gif  Navigation triangle Leaflets
spacer gif  Navigation triangle Best practice
Hot links Navigation bar
Hot topics
Tools and related links bar
Cymraeg
Freedom of Information
Accessibility
Other Ombudsmen and complaint handlers
Feedback
Satisfied with our service?
 

Chapter 1: Hospital, Community Health and Ambulance Trusts

Case No. E.1934/97-98 - General practitioner's removal of patients from list

Matter considered: GP's removal of patients was unreasonable

Complaint against: A GP in the Calderdale and Kirklees Health Authority area, Yorkshire

Summary of case

Mrs P removed herself from her GP's list after making a complaint to him on behalf of her mother-in-law. In January 1997, her parents, Mr and Mrs Q, were told by the Health Authority that they were to be removed from the list of their GP, a partner at the same practice. Mr and Mrs Q had been on the GP's list for many years without difficulty. When they asked for an explanation they were told that the practice did not wish to deal with Mrs P, should Mr and Mrs Q have a complaint against the practice in the future.

Findings

The Ombudsman considered that the breakdown in the relationship between the practice and Mrs P did not necessarily mean that the GP's relationship with Mr and Mrs Q had to be ended. The GP knew nothing about the strength of the relationship between Mrs P and Mr and Mrs Q, and did not attempt to discuss the situation with Mr and Mrs Q. The Ombudsman concluded that the GP did not give adequate consideration to all relevant matters and removed the Qs unreasonably. He expressed grave concern that the practice had previously told Mrs P that she and her family would be removed if she complained. That was not in the spirit of the NHS complaints procedure, or in line with guidance from the General Medical Council.

Remedy

The GP declined to apologise and remained of the view that his decision was correct. However, he accepted that he could have informed Mr and Mrs Q in more detail of the reasons for his decision.

Previous < Contents > Next

Full text of this investigation

Back to top

 

Last updated: 12 January 2006

     
Footer line

Privacy | © 2008 Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman
Home |  Can the Ombudsman help you |  Publications |  About us |  News |  Work for us |  Contact us |  Feedback