Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman Logo - Link to home page Spacer for design
Sitemap | Search     
Home Can the Ombudsman help you? Publications About us News Work for us Contact us Spacer line
spacer gif  Navigation triangle Publications
spacer gif  Navigation triangle Principles
spacer gif  Navigation triangle Selected cases
spacer gif  Navigation triangle Special reports
spacer gif  Navigation triangle Annual Report
spacer gif  Navigation triangle Leaflets
spacer gif  Navigation triangle Best practice
Hot links Navigation bar
Hot topics
Tools and related links bar
Cymraeg
Freedom of Information
Accessibility
Other Ombudsmen and complaint handlers
Feedback
Satisfied with our service?
 

Chapter 1: Hospital, Community Health and Ambulance Trusts

Case No. E.42/97-98 - General practitioner's manner during a consultation and removal of patient from his list

Matters considered: GP's actions and manner during a consultation and the way in which he removed a patient from his list

Complaint against: A GP in the Ayrshire and Arran Health Board area

Summary of case

Shortly after a consultation with his GP on 21 January 1997, Mr A returned to the GP's surgery in the belief that the GP had forgotten to include an antibiotic on his prescription. The GP told Mr A that he did not need antibiotics and that he should go away and see another doctor. Mr A subsequently received a letter dated 22 January from the Health Board telling him he had been removed from the GP's list. Mr A complained that the GP's behaviour towards him on 21 January was rude and unprofessional and that the GP's decision to remove him from his list of patients was unreasonable.

Findings

From the evidence of both Mr A and the GP it was clear that the second meeting on 21 January became fraught and that each perceived the manner of the other to be inappropriate. However in the absence of any other evidence the Ombudsman was unable to make a finding on the complaint about the GP's behaviour. The GP said he felt that the doctor/patient relationship had broken down because Mr A would not accept his diagnosis and advice. While appreciating that the GP faced a difficult situation in the face of Mr A's insistence that he needed antibiotics, the Ombudsman found that the GP acted precipitately in removing Mr A from his list without further discussion or considering alternatives.

Remedy

The GP was not prepared to apologise for the shortcomings the Ombudsman identified.

Previous < Contents

Full text of this investigation

Back to top

 

Last updated: 12 January 2006

     
Footer line

Privacy | © 2008 Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman
Home |  Can the Ombudsman help you |  Publications |  About us |  News |  Work for us |  Contact us |  Feedback