Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman Logo - Link to home page Spacer for design
Sitemap | Search     
Home Can the Ombudsman help you? Publications About us News Work for us Contact us Spacer line
spacer gif  Navigation triangle Publications
spacer gif  Navigation triangle Principles
spacer gif  Navigation triangle Selected cases
spacer gif  Navigation triangle Special reports
spacer gif  Navigation triangle Annual Report
spacer gif  Navigation triangle Leaflets
spacer gif  Navigation triangle Best practice
Hot links Navigation bar
Hot topics
Tools and related links bar
Cymraeg
Freedom of Information
Accessibility
Other Ombudsmen and complaint handlers
Feedback
Satisfied with our service?
 

Chapter 1: Hospital, Community Health and Ambulance Trusts

Case No. E.678/98-99 - GP's inadequate explanations of his diagnosis, care and treatment of a patient

Complaint against: A GP in the Barnsley Health Authority area

Summary of case

In January 1997 a man visited his GP complaining of a chest infection. The GP prescribed tablets to treat an ulcer. The man continued to feel unwell and the GP arranged for him to have blood and urine tests, an x-ray and an electrocardiogram. On receiving the results, the GP went to the patient's home and told him that he had cancer and might only have a few weeks to live. The man was later admitted to hospital and underwent further tests which did not detect cancer but did reveal pancytopenia (a reduction in all types of blood cells). The man's family believed that the shock of being given bad news caused the man to lose his will to live. On 27 August the man died. The cause of death was given as bronchopneumonia. The man's family complained that the doctor did not explain adequately to them why he had failed to treat the man's chest infection; had inappropriately prescribed medicine for his ulcer and had told him that he had cancer without first admitting him to hospital for confirmatory tests. The GP met the complainant informally to discuss her concerns; he later made a written formal response and attended a conciliation meeting.

Findings

The Ombudsman found that the GP had provided adequate and reasonable explanation of his treatment but that it was understandably difficult for the family to accept the explanations because of the complex clinical picture. The Ombudsman did not uphold the complaint.

Previous < Contents > Next

Full text of this investigation

Back to top

 

Last updated: 9 January 2006

     
Footer line

Privacy | © 2008 Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman
Home |  Can the Ombudsman help you |  Publications |  About us |  News |  Work for us |  Contact us |  Feedback