Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman Logo - Link to home page Spacer for design
Sitemap | Search     
Home Can the Ombudsman help you? Publications About us News Work for us Contact us Spacer line
spacer gif  Navigation triangle Publications
spacer gif  Navigation triangle Principles
spacer gif  Navigation triangle Selected cases
spacer gif  Navigation triangle Special reports
spacer gif  Navigation triangle Annual Report
spacer gif  Navigation triangle Leaflets
spacer gif  Navigation triangle Best practice
Hot links Navigation bar
Hot topics
Tools and related links bar
Cymraeg
Freedom of Information
Accessibility
Other Ombudsmen and complaint handlers
Feedback
Satisfied with our service?
 

Chapter 1: Hospital, Community Health and Ambulance Trusts

Case No. E.860/98-99 - Interface between NHS and private hospital treatment

Complaint against: Ashford and St Peter's Hospital NHS Trust

Summary of case

On 3 July 1997 Mr X sustained wrist injuries as a result of a fall. He arrived at the A and E department at St Peter's Hospital (the NHS hospital), Chertsey at about 12.30pm, and was assessed and treated quickly. At about 2.30pm he was examined by an orthopaedic SHO. It was subsequently planned to admit him to a ward overnight for neurological examination, and that he would have an operation the next day. In the event, nursing staff in the ward were reluctant to accept him; and consequent to a conversation with the orthopaedic SHO, Mrs X agreed that her husband should be transferred to a private hospital located on the same site as the NHS hospital. He was transferred there at 6.00pm. On 4 July Mrs X told the orthopaedic SHO that their private health insurance would not cover the proposed treatment. But when she and her husband learned that the NHS operation list was now full—and the operation could not take place until the evening of 5 July—they agreed to pay for it to be done privately. Mrs X complained about the delay in the A and E department; that the Trust provided her with confusing and incomplete information about the operation and aftercare; and that the Trust had unreasonably refused to reimburse their costs.

Findings

The Ombudsman found that there was a serious failure in communication and a lack of co-ordination in the admission arrangements; and against that background he found that the time Mr X had to wait in the A and E department after 2.30pm was unreasonable. He also found no evidence that staff had properly explained to Mr X that by spending the night in the private hospital he had effectively removed himself from the list on 4 July for an NHS operation. He did not uphold the complaint that the Trust failed to provide appropriate information about aftercare. The Ombudsman considered that Mr and Mrs X must accept some responsibility for their own decision to opt for private treatment. The Trust, acknowledging that there had been some communication failure, had already offered Mr and Mrs X an ex gratia payment of £500 and to waive charges for the CT scan. The Ombudsman considered that was reasonable.

Remedy

The Trust apologised.

Previous < Contents > Next

Full text of this investigation

Back to top

 

Last updated: 9 January 2006

     
Footer line

Privacy | © 2008 Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman
Home |  Can the Ombudsman help you |  Publications |  About us |  News |  Work for us |  Contact us |  Feedback