PHSO

Listening and Learning:

The Ombudsman’s review of complaint handling by the NHS in England 2011-12

Ms D should have been screened annually for eye damage caused by  diabetes (diabetic retinopathy) at an eye clinic run by the Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Trust (the Trust). However, the Trust failed to provide this for  almost two years.  When she did have her  appointment, damage to the inside of her eye was seen and she had another test  the following month.  This showed a  condition called macular disease (the macula is the central part of the eye  responsible for fine vision), which the Trust said was no longer treatable.

We found that the Trust did not act in line with national  guidelines, which say that screening should be carried out every 12  months.  They did not adequately  investigate Ms D’s macular disease because they did not use a scan to take a  very detailed picture of the inside of her eye. We also found that they did not  adequately diagnose Ms D’s macular disease, because they said it could not  be treated, when in fact treatment was available.

We could not say whether earlier screening would have revealed  Ms D’s macular disease.  When the  Trust diagnosed her condition, they missed an opportunity to give her treatment  that would have stabilised or even improved her eyesight. Instead, Ms D  was left with eye damage that was probably permanent and irreversible.

The Trust  agreed to write to Ms D to acknowledge and apologise for their failings and pay  her £8,000 in compensation. They took steps to improve their screening service,  including compiling a database of all diabetic retinopathy patients and  ensuring that referrals from the screening service were monitored by the  Trust’s eye clinic. They made sure that all patients suspected of having  macular disease were given proper scans.