Independent advice and support services

This guide will help you understand more about the independent support and advice services available to people making a complaint. 

It includes information about:

  • the different types of support available to people who make a complaint about their (or another person’s) NHS care and treatment, including: 
    • independent NHS complaints advocacy services 
    • specialist independent advice and support services 
  • the aims of these different services and when and how to signpost people to them 
  • the value of involving an advocate or specialist advice service and how they can help people who are faced with difficult decisions – particularly where there are other processes that may be an alternative to, or run in parallel with, a complaint. 

This guide is one of the Good complaint handling series designed to help you meet the NHS Complaint Standards. Read it alongside the Model complaint handling procedure and other Good complaint handling guides.

What standards and regulations are relevant to this guide?

Positively welcoming complaints

Organisations make sure people know how to access advice and support to make a complaint, including giving details of appropriate independent complaints advocacy and advice providers, any Patient Advice and Liaison Service (PALs), and other support networks. 

Organisations make sure staff are able to identify when issues raised in a complaint are likely to be addressed (or are being addressed) via another route, so a co-ordinated approach can be taken. Other possible routes include inquest processes, a local disciplinary process, legal claims or referrals to regulators. Staff know when and how to seek guidance and support from colleagues and are able to provide people with information on where they can get support. 

Your organisation ‘must make arrangements … for the handling and consideration of complaints.’ The arrangements must ensure that: … ‘complainants are treated with respect and courtesy’ … that they receive ‘so far as is reasonably practical – assistance to enable them to understand the procedure … or advice on where they may obtain such assistance’. 

Duty of candour 

The Care Quality Commission’s guidance on the duty of candour says that organisations should give people going through the procedure information about ‘available impartial advocacy and support services, their local Healthwatch and other relevant support groups, for example Cruse Bereavement Services and Action against Medical Accidents (AvMA).’ 

Serious incident investigations 

NHS England’s Serious Incident Framework recommends that organisations should make patients or families involved in investigations aware of sources of independent advice and advocacy, including the national charity Action against Medical Accidents (AvMA). 

What you need to do

This section sets out two different types of advocacy available to your service users or their families or representatives: 

  • the independent NHS complaints advocacy service 
  • specialist independent advice and support. 

The independent NHS complaints advocacy service is a free, independent, impartial service funded by local authorities. It is designed to guide anyone wanting to complain about their (or another person’s) NHS care and treatment through the process of complaining to the appropriate NHS organisation. 

Everyone in your organisation who has a public-facing role needs to be aware of who your local independent NHS complaints advocacy provider is. That way, they can quickly signpost anyone who wants to make a complaint to help and support, if they need it. If you’re not sure who your provider is, check with your local authority or Healthwatch

Tip: Get to know your local advocacy team
Try to establish a relationship with your local independent NHS complaints advocacy service team. They are a valuable source of information about the needs of people who use your service and the local population. 

They can also help you understand what their service offers, as services can vary from area to area. This will help you: 

  • make sure you provide correct information about the advocacy service to anyone wanting to make a complaint 
  • refer people who want to make a complaint for advocacy support directly, where appropriate 
  • secure early resolution of complaints by making sure people making a complaint are guided through the process and fully understand their options 
  • help people who want to make a complaint to access advocacy rapidly, so they are supported as early in the process as possible 
  • shape local arrangements for advocacy, including working with commissioners. 

Tips: Sharing details about advice and support 
- Share the advocacy service’s contact details on your website and in posters and information leaflets about your own complaints service. 
- Share leaflets about the service, or links to the service, in your letters. This makes it clear that the service is independent and separate from your organisation. 
- Independent NHS complaints advocacy providers can also signpost and cross-refer to other helpful advice and specialist support services. 

An independent NHS complaints advocacy service can support anyone who needs to navigate the complaints process. There are no specific eligibility criteria. Wherever possible, they will facilitate self-advocacy in line with the empowering model of advocacy.  

Most advocates working with the independent NHS complaints advocacy service have relevant advocacy qualifications and are required to work in line with the Advocacy Charter. This ensures that they have a full understanding of the NHS complaints process. 

They are also trained to support people with specific needs or protected characteristics and are able to work alongside other organisations where needed. 

 

An independent advocate working with the NHS complaints advocacy service can provide support at any stage of a complaint, including at the very beginning. If they are involved early, it is more likely that the complaint is productive and easy to understand.  

The advocate will also: 

  • make sure that the complaint is directed to the right part of the NHS (this can sometimes be difficult to identify) 
  • explain the NHS complaint journey to the person making the complaint and help them understand what you are doing to investigate 
  • act as mediator between the person making the complaint and you 
  • support them until the process is finished, including support with the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) procedures if needed. 

Tip: Some organisations also enlist advocacy organisations to  independently facilitate their patient experience and patient participation groups. 

When someone complains, they may be faced with difficult decisions – particularly if there are other processes that may offer an alternative to a complaint or could run alongside it. This is common if the incident that gave rise to the complaint involves suspected avoidable harm or complex clinical issues.  

When someone makes a complaint about this type of situation, make sure you recognise their wider needs. They may need more specialist independent advice and support. 

Complaints in which people may benefit from more specialist independent advice services include those where: 

  • someone has been harmed and there is a need for an independent view on the clinical aspects 
  • litigation is being considered or has started 
  • there will be an inquest (or the family wants one) 
  • there has been a patient safety incident, so the organisation must put the duty of candour or a serious incident investigation in motion 
  • the person making the complaint wants the organisation to investigate potential fitness-to-practice issues involving health professionals  
  • the person making the complaint wants to raise patient safety concerns to regulators or commissioners of services 
  • there are concerns about private treatment that is believed to have caused harm. 

As well as providing details of the local advocacy provider you may need to signpost to further support. For example: 

  • If the complaint has any of the features listed above provide the details of the national charity Action against Medical Accidents (AvMA).  
  • If someone has experienced trauma or bereavement, they may also need counselling or mental health support, arranged either by your organisation or sourced independently. 
  • If someone is facing financial hardship they may also need practical advice on benefits or other financial matters, as well as support with their complaint.

You need to provide details of how people can access all these forms of support. 

Tip: For more information on when to refer people and which organisation to refer them to, see our guide to advocacy, advice and support organisations

Case studies

The case studies below show the value of involving support and advice services in your work to resolve complaints. No real names have been used in these case studies.

Shelley's story

What was the complaint about? 

Josephine died in hospital because of a nosebleed, which caused choking. Her daughter, Shelley, made a complaint because she felt that her mother’s treatment had been inappropriate.  

Shelley was not informed about advocacy until she received the response to her complaint. Information about advocacy services was provided at the end of the letter, but it incorrectly signposted her to the previous service provider. The complaint response letter did not answer all the points Shelley had raised, and she and the family felt ongoing distress about the way Josephine had died.  

How did the advocate help? 

Having seen the organisation on television, Shelley got in touch with Action against Medical Accidents (AvMA). The organisation explained its role and her various options, and Shelley realised that litigation was not a route the family wanted to take. AvMA signposted Shelley to her local provider explained how they could help. 

Shelley and her local advocate worked together to raise her outstanding concerns with the hospital. The advocate helped Shelley identify what she wanted to happen as a result of the complaint, and to articulate her views to the consultant in charge of her mother’s care. 

What was the outcome? 

A full investigation was carried out, resulting in the case being referred to the Nursing and Midwifery Council and a fitness-to-practice investigation. The advocate also signposted Shelley to the local bereavement support service, to address her feelings of guilt about the way her mother had died. 

Advocacy supported Shelley and her family to navigate a complicated process and reach a resolution that gave them the closure they needed on a very distressing process. 

What are the lessons from this case study? 

  • When anyone wants to make a complaint, signpost them to their local NHS Complaints Advocacy service as early as possible. 
  • Where harm or death has taken place, make the person aware of specialist advice and advocacy services such as Action against Medical Accidents (AvMA). 
  • If someone who is making a complaint appears distressed, consider signposting to a local or national counselling or specialist mental health support service. 
  • All advocacy and specialist advice providers are equipped to signpost and cross-refer to each other. 

Ravi's story

What was the complaint about? 

Ravi wanted to make a complaint when his treatment was stopped after a clinical consultant said he had been verbally aggressive. Ravi has a diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia. He also has a learning disability that prevents him from being able to read and write. 

How did specialist support help? 

The trust signposted Ravi to his local advocacy provider. With the advocate’s support, Ravi submitted a letter of complaint and was offered a local resolution meeting (LRM) within a short period of time. 

On the day, Ravi and his advocate were called into the meeting room and introduced to the staff members present. Because Ravi cannot read or write, his advocate asked for the meeting to be recorded so it was accessible to him. The trust agreed. Ravi was able to get all his points across during the meeting and felt listened to. 

What was the outcome? 

A long time had passed since Ravi’s last appointment. Appointments of this nature can take months – and sometimes, years – to get. However, following the meeting, he was given an emergency appointment in a fortnight’s time. Ravi was very happy and considered this a great result.  

He disclosed that the meeting had given him a purpose to leave the house, and that it was only the second time he had done so in six months. If the meeting had been delayed, this would have been detrimental to his overall mental and physical wellbeing. If Ravi had attended without the advocate, he may have become frustrated and unable to communicate his concerns and what impact the situation had on him. 

What are the lessons from this case study? 

  • When someone makes a complaint, signpost them to the correct advocacy provider at the start of the process. 
  • Advocate support can enable someone to articulate their feelings and wishes more clearly and effectively, despite communication difficulties. 
  • Preparing a focused complaint letter can provoke a swift response to the client’s needs and enable the organisation to deal more quickly with the complaint. In Ravi’s case, this resulted in a positive outcome and avoided further missed treatment and a prolonged complaint process. 

Darius's story

What was the complaint about? 

Darius attended the Accident and Emergency department following a cycling accident. He was discharged with suspected bruised ribs but died that evening at home from a bleeding spleen. 

Darius’s parents were told what had happened. They had concerns about the treatment he had received but were unsure what to do or whether they wanted to make a complaint. They discussed this with the hospital, and staff gave them the AvMA leaflet on the duty of candour. Because it seemed that its actions may have resulted in their son’s death, the hospital launched an investigation under the duty of candour regulations.  

How did specialist support help? 

Darius’s parents contacted AvMA, which assigned them a caseworker to support them at a meeting to discuss the duty of candour investigation. The trust explained what had happened, to the best of its knowledge, and promised to share the results of the investigation when it was completed.  

After discussion with the parents, the caseworker asked if they had informed the coroner about the death and it transpired they had not. The trust did this and the coroner decided to hold an inquest.  

Initially, the trust thought that it could not share its investigation report with Darius’s parents until after the inquest was held. However, after talking to their caseworker, the parents challenged this and the trust agreed to share the report with the family as soon as it was ready. 

What was the outcome? 

The caseworker reviewed the investigation report with the parents. AvMA recommended that the parents should have legal representation at the inquest and arranged for a barrister to attend on a pro bono basis. The inquest concluded with a ‘prevention of future deaths’ letter being issued to the trust. 

The family decided not to take legal action or make a formal complaint but remained concerned about the actions of one doctor in particular. The AvMA caseworker helped them make a referral to the GMC, which agreed to investigate. 

What are the lessons from this case study? 

  • Organisations need to take concerns seriously, whether or not a complaint is made. 
  • Making patients and families aware of specialist independent advice services such as AvMA can help them play an active role in investigations and inform decisions about which processes to follow. 
  • Involving an advice and support service can help an organisation to manage a difficult situation appropriately. This can help the person complaining to feel that the process followed was fair, which may avoid them needing to take a complaint further or take legal action. 

Use our quick guide to signpost people to further advice and support if they need it. 

Paragraphs