In October 2018, we issued a proposal to investigate a sample of complaints brought to us about the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) and the Independent Case Examiner (ICE) regarding changes in Women’s State Pension age.
When the judicial review was announced, we found that it would consider issues related to those we were proposing to investigate. We paused looking at these complaints while those issues were being considered by the court.
Following the High Court ruling, we are now starting to investigate a sample of six complaints about DWP’s communication of changes to women’s state pension age. We have agreed the scope of the investigation with the six sample complainants. By law, we investigate in private so we will not be publishing information about the investigation while it is ongoing.
Recommendations we cannot make
Many complainants have told us they are seeking reinstatement of their state pension, the state pension age to revert to 60, and/or compensation for the amount of state pension they would have received had their state pension age not changed.
The 2019 High Court decision has made clear that we are not able to recommend DWP reimburse ‘lost’ pensions. We also cannot recommend that anyone receive their state pension any earlier than the law allows. To do so would reverse or try to reverse primary legislation.
Deciding what recommendations to make
When we find an injustice was suffered as result of maladministration, we make recommendations which might include compensation is paid.
To decide how much compensation to recommend we refer to our guidance about financial remedy including our Severity of Injustice scale and take account of relevant precedents.
The Severity of Injustice scale contains six different levels of injustice that a complaint could fall into. Each level includes a range of amounts of compensation we would usually recommend in those circumstances. For example, compensation for a Level 3 injustice would fall within the range of £500-£950.
Our website has copies of reports of other investigations we have done so you will be able to see the recommendations we have made in other cases we have investigated.
The complaints we have received
We have received complaints about the DWP’s communication of changes to women’s state pension age, first introduced by the Pensions Act 1995, and associated issues.
Women say they have experienced financial loss and a negative impact on their health, emotional well-being or home life as a result.
We have received a significant number of similar complaints since we first proposed to investigate. Our review of the complaints shows that they relate to the same key issues. As we are currently investigating these key issues, we are not accepting any new complaints about them at present.
Who is affected by the changes to state pension age for women?
Women born after 6 April 1950 are affected by changes in state pension age introduced by the Pensions Act 1995 and further changes made in subsequent years. To see how you are affected visit the GOV.UK website.
When will you have a finding/decision following your investigation?
Each investigation we do varies depending on its complexity and the amount of evidence we have to review so we don’t have a fixed time.
Why are you investigating when an appeal against the judicial review decision is ongoing with the Court of Appeal?
Our investigation is looking at the issues from a different perspective to the Court of Appeal so it should not be affected by it. The Court of Appeal hearing may, however, affect progress between different stages of our investigation and we will assess that at the appropriate point.
Why are you only investigating six sample complainants?
The six sample complaints reflect the range of issues complained about. If we make recommendations, we would ask DWP to apply those recommendations to everyone who has been similarly affected by any failings we identify.
The six sample complainants have agreed to the scope of our investigation.
How will you investigate these complaints?
There are three stages to our investigation.
In the first stage, we will look at whether there was maladministration in DWP’s communication of changes to women’s state pension age. Maladministration is when an organisation does something wrong or provides poor service. We will look at what DWP should have done to communicate the changes in women’s state pension age, and whether it did this.
If we find maladministration, we will then move to the second stage and consider whether it led to an injustice for the complainant.
At the second stage, we would also consider the complaints about DWP not adequately communicating the required number of years of national insurance contributions to receive a full state pension, as well as DWP’s and ICE’s complaint handling.
If we find there was an injustice that has not already been remedied then we will proceed to the third stage and make recommendations to put things right.
Are you not accepting new complaints because you can’t manage the number of complaints you’re getting?
No. We are not accepting new complaints because no new issues are being complained about.
Does this mean that if somebody hasn’t had a complaint accepted by you already, they won’t benefit from any recommendations you might make?
No. If we make recommendations for compensation, we would ask DWP to apply those recommendations to everyone who has been similarly affected by any failings we identify.
Where can I find out more about the changes to state pension age for women and the judicial review?
Parliament has updated its information on changes in the state pension age for women born in the 1950s. This includes information about the judicial review. You can find out more on the Parliament.uk website.